Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.1d 279 - Lockman v. Lang

Lockman v. Lang’s Empirical Analysis

128 F. 279 · 1903

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
May 1932
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1932

11 federal appellate ·

601903191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Rochford · Swarts v. Siegel · Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's Sons · City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co. · Grape Creek Coal Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Attention has been sharply called to this rule (Rule 11, C. C. A., Eighth Circuit [91 Fed. vi, 32 C. C. A. lxxxviii]) and the announcement has been plainly made that .it would be enforced, although in the earlier cases the errors assigned were carefully examined, that no injustice might result from an unexpected application of the rule [citing cases]. But in the later cases the rule has been steadily and uniformly enforced' [citing cases]. * * * The assignment of errors in this case was not filed until seven days after the allowance of the appeal, and the appeal must be dismissed under rule 11.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A proceeding in bankruptcy is a proceeding in equity, and cannot be reviewed by a writ of error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.