Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.1d 584 - Buckingham v. Estes

Buckingham v. Estes’s Empirical Analysis

128 F. 584 · 1904

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
September 1970
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1970

10 federal appellate · 6 district ·

6019041910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North America · Hutchinson v. Otis · Furrer v. Ferris · Benjamin Story v. Louisa Livingston · Camden v. Stuart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would be a narrow construefioii of sections 57 and 57n which would not regard a claim so presented and litigated in a bankrupt proceeding as ‘proven’ within the limitation of the section. A claim ‘proven’ within the year is amendable after the lapse of the year, and the court below probably regarded her petition as a ‘statement under oath, in writing, signed by a creditor, setting forth the claim,’ etc., and therefore subject to amendment, to comply with the further formalities of section 57. In this the court did not err.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Claims shall not be proved against a bankrupt estate subsequent to one year after the adjudication; or if they are liquidated by litigation and the final judgment therein is rendered within thirty days before or after the expiration of such time, then within sixty days after the rendition of such judgment.” Act July 1, 1898, e. 541, 30 Stat. 561 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3444].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.