Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.2d 183 - Hickok Producing & Development Co. v. Texas Co.

Hickok Producing & Development Co. v. Texas Co.’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.2d 183 · 1942

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2000

17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

801942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owen v. King · Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. Sartor · Cities Service Co. v. Koeneke · Al Parker Securities Co. v. Owen · John Church Co. v. Martinez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Mere ignorance of one’s rights will not toll the statute of limitations. Concealment by defendant only by silence is not enough. He must be guilty of some trick or contrivance tending to exclude suspicion and prevent inquiry.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.