← 128 F.2d 208 - Perkins v. Endicott Johnson Corp.

Perkins v. Endicott Johnson Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.2d 208 · 1942

Citation profile

cited by 95 later decisions

cited 3 times by the Supreme Court

states following

June 1997

most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1997 · most notably Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York (1997), Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. (1960)

56 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 29 U.S.C. § 151 (§ 1 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 211 · 41 U.S.C. § 38 · 41 U.S.C. § 40 · 41 U.S.C. § 43 · 44 U.S.C. § 301

Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Crowell v. Benson · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Cobbledick v. United States · Burdeau v. McDowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““ * * * it js not the duty of an auxiliary court or judge, within whose jurisdiction testimony is being taken in a suit pending in the court of another district, to consider or determine the competency, materiality, or relevancy of the evidence which one of the parties seeks to elicit. It is the duty of such a court or judge to compel the production of the evidence, although the judge deems it incompetent or immaterial, unless the witness or the evidence is privileged, or it clearly and affirmatively appears that the evidence cannot possibly be competent, material, or relevant, and that it would be an abuse of the process of the court to compel its production.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. In the Matter of Surety Association of America, Glendale Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Republic Insurance Company
“made, as to a different company, by the acting administrator, and because of certain conduct thought to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company. Federal Trade Commission v. The Superior Oil Company, Inc., a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon Corporation, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Shell Oil Company, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Company of California, a Corporation. Federal Trade Commission v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a Corporation

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.