Why Corp. v. Super Ironer Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
128 F.2d 539 · 1942
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1985
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. · Great Lakes Transit Corp. v. Heussler · John Tuman & Sons, Inc. v. Basse · Bowen v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge of the credibility of the witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.