Pulfer v. Commissioner

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1942.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-05-13

2 counsel of record

Relies on Pulfer v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-05-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2010

6 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William A. Borrusch, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

¶2Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Sewall Key, J. P. Wenchel, John’M. Morawski, J. Louis Monarch, and Samuel H. Levy, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

¶3Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. ,

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; upon consideration whereof, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Board promulgated February 19, 1941. 43 B. T. A. 677.