Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.2d 793 - Kelly v. Johnston

Kelly v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.2d 793 · 1942

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
February 1971
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Lanza · Hebert v. State of Louisiana · Macomber v. Hudspeth · Norton v. Zerbst · Creech v. Hudspeth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It may be that the testimony of the appellant and his confession as to where he obtained the money and stamps are the truth and that if so neither the money nor stamps were mail matter within the contemplation of § 197, but that question is foreclosed by the judgment and conviction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If there is a federal offense which the indictment apparently attempts to charge, and the court has jurisdiction over such offense and over the person of the accused, the sufficiency of the indictment is not open to challenge on habeas corpus.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.