Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.2d 888 - Jones v. Thompson

Jones v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.2d 888 · 1942

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 1983
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1983 · most notably Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp. (1942), Microwave Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (1974)

29 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

12019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. · Conboy v. First National Bank · Irving Trust Co. of New York v. Nelson · Missouri v. Todd · In re Federman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[m]otions to vacate orders, motions for rehearings or for new trials, and like motions are addressed to the discretion of the trial court and are intended to call its attention to errors allegedly committed by it and to afford an opportunity for their correction. Orders granting or denying such motions are not appealable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate an order is not the equivalent of an appeal from the order itself,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.