Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

128 F.2d 923

Docket No. 9064.

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Leviski

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1942.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-06-01

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-06-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1984

4 federal appellate ·

2019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1McAfee, Grossman, Hanning & Newcomer, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2*924Herschel G. Holland, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause having been heard upon the record, and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the parties, arid it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment entered thereon; and no reversible error being found in the record, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

/128/f2d/923 · .json · Public domain