Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

128 F.2d 924

Docket No. 9065.

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Leviski

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1942.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-06-01

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1982

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1McAfee, Grossman, Hanning & Newcomer, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

¶2Herschel G. Holland, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3•Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause having been heard upon the record, and upon the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the parties, and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment entered thereon; and no reversible error being found in the record, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

/128/f2d/924 · .json · Public domain