Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.3d 1173 - Wagner v. Hanks

Wagner v. Hanks’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.3d 1173 · 1997

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably Wilkinson v. Austin (2005), Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. Hanks (2000)

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

3301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Sandin v. Conner · Meachum v. Fano · Olim v. Wakinekona · Vitek v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every state must have somewhere in its prison system single-person cells in which prisoners are sometimes confined not because they have misbehaved but simply because the prison has no other space, wishes to protect some prisoners from others, wishes to keep prisoners isolated from one another in order to minimize the risk of riots or other disturbances, wishes to prevent the spread of disease, and so forth.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “decide whether logic should be pressed so far,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “But it would be difficult (we do not say impossible) to make disciplinary segregation sufficiently more restrictive than the conditions of the general population ... to count as an atypical and significant deprivation of liberty[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.