United States v. Holloway’s Empirical Analysis
128 F.3d 1254 · 1997
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably United States v. Lacey (2000), United States v. Jones (1998)
26 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Hudson v. Palmer · Albernaz v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, the underlying offense to Count One, unlike that of Count Three, required the knowing and unlawful possession of a controlled substance. Count Three, on the other hand, required proof of an overt act and the presence of a scheme to provide a prohibited object to a federal inmate. Reciprocally distinguishable and independent conspiracies, regardless of their overlapping goals, do not offend Block-burger principles. American Tobacco Co. v. United States, 328 U.S. 781 , 66 S.Ct. 1125 , 90 L.Ed. 1575 (1946).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We view the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict, giving the verdict the benefit of all reasonable inferences, and [we] will reverse only if the jury must have had a reasonable doubt concerning one of the essential elements of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.