Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

128 F.3d 1305

Docket No. 93-55392.

Jacobson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 23, 1997. As Amended Jan. 23, 1998.

Relies on Jacobson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2020

1 state decisions

1201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

¶2

The majority opinion, filed January 23, 1997 [105 F.3d 1288], is amended as follows:

¶3

At Slip Opinion page 888 in footnote 3 [105 F.3d at 1295], in the third paragraph, the deletion should be only of the sentence "The question of when a termination occurs is a mixed question of law and fact." The citation should be corrected as follows: "See 26 C.F.R. § 1.401...."

¶4

At Slip Opinion page 900 [105 F.3d at 1300], delete the first full paragraph starting with "In determining whether ... " and ending with " ... to ERISA context)."

¶5

With the above amendment, a majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

¶6

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R.App. 35(b).

¶7

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rhearing en banc is rejected.

/128/f3d/1305 · .json · Public domain