Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.3d 191 - Halperin v. Abacus Technology Corp.

Halperin v. Abacus Technology Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.3d 191 · 1997

Citation profile

193
cited by 193 later decisions
6
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 48 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 193 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Department (1998), Cline v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1998)

41 federal appellate · 48 district · 10 state decisions

10701997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 193 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““assure[ ] that truly disabled, but genuinely capable, individuals will not face discrimination in employment because of stereotypes about the insurmountability of their handicaps.” ... Extending the statutory protections available under the ADA to individuals with broken bones, sprained joints, sore muscles, infectious diseases, or other ailments that temporarily limit an individual’s ability to work would trivialize this lofty objective.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unable to come to work on a regular basis [is] unable to satisfy any of the functions of the job in question, much less the essential ones.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.