Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.3d 285 - United States v. Fleming

United States v. Fleming’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.3d 285 · 1997

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2014

6 federal appellate ·

120199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287

Relies on United States v. Moored · United States v. Schneider · United States v. Watkins · United States v. Rice · United States v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Loss Under Subsection (b)(1) * * * (A) General Rule — Subject to the exclusions in subdivision (D) [interest, late fees, cost of investigation and prosecution], loss is the greater of actual loss or intended loss. (i) Actual Loss — “Actual loss” means the reasonably foreseeable pecuniary harm that resulted from the offense. (ii) Intended Loss — “Intended loss” (I) means the pecuniary harm that was intended to result from the offense; and (II) includes intended pecuniary harm that would have been impossible or unlikely to occur (e.g., as in a government sting operation, or an insurance fraud in which the claim exceeded the insured value). $ ^ $ :¡í ^ (C) Estimation of Loss. — The court need only make a reasonable estimate of the loss. The sentencing judge is in a unique position to assess the evidence and estimate the loss based upon that evidence. For this reason, the court’s loss determination is entitled to appropriate deference. See 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e) and (f).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in which the total intended loss bore no relation to 'economic reality' ... because ... the plan had no chance of success.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.