Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.3d 430 - In re Perrigo Co.

In re Perrigo Co.’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.3d 430 · 1997

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
5
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Dreiling v. Jain (2004), United States v. Amlani (1999)

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

3401997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · Upjohn Company v. United States · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc. · United States v. Nobles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The party seeking the writ has no other adequate means, such as direct appeal, to attain the relief desired. (2) The petitioner will be damaged or prejudiced in a way not correctable on appeal. (3) The district court’s order is clearly erroneous as a matter of law. (4) The district court’s order is an oft-repeated error, or manifests a persistent disregard of the federal rules. (5) The district court’s order raises new and important problems, or issues of law of first impression.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “means of immediate appellate review of orders compelling the disclosure of documents and information claimed to be protected from disclosure by privilege or other interests in confidentiality.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`questions of unusual importance necessary to the economical and efficient administration of justice,' or `important issues of first impression.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.