Glover v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis
128 F.3d 900 · 1997
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2018
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Murray v. Carrier · 660 So. 2d 1189 - State Ex Rel. Glover v. State · Johnson v. Mississippi · Dugger v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In all cases in which a state prisoner has defaulted his federal claims in state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, federal habeas review of the claims is barred unless the prisoner can demonstrate cause for the default and actual prejudice as a result of the alleged violation of federal law, or demonstrate that failure to consider the claims will result in a fundamental miscarriage of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[P]rocedural default does not bar consideration of a federal claim on either direct or habeas review unless the state court rendering a judgment in the case 'clearly and expressly' states that its judgment rests on a state procedural bar.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Muniz v. Johnson“a presumption of adequacy when the state court expressly relies on [a state procedural rule] in deciding not to review a claim for collateral relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fratta v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.