Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 F.3d 910 - Pelican Chapter, Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Edwards

Pelican Chapter, Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

128 F.3d 910 · 1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2010

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Allen v. Wright · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The irreducible minimum of standing contains three elements. First, the plaintiff must have.suffered an injury in fact-^-an invasion of a legally protected interest which is concrete and particularized and actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical. Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of—the injury has to be fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and not the result of the independent action of some third party not before the court. Third, it must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.