United States v. Salvador Gutierrez’s Empirical Analysis
2025
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Massachusetts District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Bailey v. United States · Stinson v. United States · Smith v. United States · Muscarello v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under Pinkerton, a defendant is 'criminally liable for the substantive offenses committed by his co-conspirators during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy,' so long as the offenses could be 'reasonably foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“at least two acts of racketeering activity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.