Hohe v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2000
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. Hudson · Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · Bourns, Inc. v. Allen-Bradley Co. · Carter v. Butz · Hummel v. Brennan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An action may be maintained as a class action if the prerequisites of subdivision (a) are satisfied, and in addition: (1) the prosecution of separate actions by ... individual members of the class would create a risk of (A) inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual members of the class which would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the class, or ... (2) the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief with respect to the class as a whole ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“found no antagonistic conflict of interest between the plaintiffs and absent class members.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hohe v. Casey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.