Drauglis v. Kappa Map Group, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 1202 (§ 103 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 17 U.S.C. § 1203 (§ 103 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 17 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Francis v. Franklin · Bragdon v. Abbott · Fogerty Fantasy Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if a general copyright notice appears on an entirely different webpage than the work at issue, then that CMI is not 'conveyed' with the work and no claim will lie under the DMCA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to be actionable under § 1202(b), a defendant must remove copyright management information from the 'body' of, or area around, plaintiff's work itself”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.