Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

128 Ga. 90

Smith v. Green

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1907

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1907-04-11

<p>Distress warrant. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. April 19, 1906.</p>

Relies on Wicker v. Siesel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1907-04-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Sloan v. Jones (1908), Ellis v. Millen Hotel Co. (1941)

31 state decisions

1001907191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Evans, J.

¶11. An affidavit for a distress warrant, which alleges that the tenant “is removing- his crops from the premises so rented, whereby-said rent is now due and unpaid,” sufficiently complies with the Civil Code, § 3124, which authorizes the landlord to distrain as soon as the rent is due, or before due, if the tenant is seeking to remove his goods from the premises.

¶22.. Where the rent contract is in writing, parol evidence is inadmissible to add to or vary its terms.

¶33. A tenant may prove that the landlord has violated the rent contract, and reduce the rent by so much as the damages occasioned thereby amount to, without filing -other pleadings than the statutory affidavit. Johnston v. Patterson, 80 Ga. 725. If complaint is made of the exclusion of evidence on which the tenant relies to establish his recoupment, the assignment of error must present so much of the excluded evidence as will show that the landlord has violated his obligations under the contract, to the tenant’s damage. When the rejected evidence is- not thus fully stated, this court is unable to say that its exclusion was erroneous.

¶44. Damages flowing from an independent tort of the landlord upon the tenant can not be set off against rent.

¶55. The right of the landlord to recover a given amount being established by the undisputed evidence, a direction of a verdict in his favor was proper.

¶6Judgment affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. The other Justices concur.
/128/ga/90 · .json · Public domain