Printz v. Shepard’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1982
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 60 Tex. Civ. App. 10 - Parker v. Sweet · Dowd v. Heuson · Peevehouse v. Smith · Federal Agency Investment Co. v. Baker · Wickham v. Traders State Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Sixth: . . . also one wagon, cart or dray . . . “Eighth: The necessary tools and implements of any mechanic, miner or other person, used and kept in stock for the purpose of carrying on his trade or business, . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘In construing exemption statutes, a number of courts have held an automobile is a “carriage” and exempt as such (Parker v. Sweet, 60 Tex. Civ. App. 10 , 127 S. W. 881 ; Peevehouse v. Smith [Tex. Civ. App.] 152 S. W. 1196 ); that it is exempt as a wagon “or other vehicle” under the Iowa statute (Lames v. Armstrong, 162 Ia. 327 , 49 L. R. A., n. s., 691); and even in our own case of Wickham v. Bank, 95 Kan. 657 , 149 Pac. 433 , this court more than ten years ago took notice of the fact that the automobile was rapidly and certainly superseding the “wagon” which was specifically exempted from seizure on execution under the statute of 1868.’ ” (p. 211.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Foster v. Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.