Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 KAN 564 - State v. Netherton

State v. Netherton’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2002

18 state decisions

40192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Woodman · State v. Truskett · State v. Burton · State v. Ragan · State v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... We think the failure of the court to admonish the jury to disregard these remarks was error, even if the jury had retired from the room before the request was made." (p. 575.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.