Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 MICH 348 - Dyer v. Skadan

Dyer v. Skadan’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
5
states following
April 1977
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1977

14 state decisions

4019011910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wheelwright v. Wheelwright · Worrall v. . Munn · Hatch v. Hatch · Taft v. Taft · Wilson v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is ancient and familiar that a deed cannot be delivered in escrow to the grantee. When there is a valid delivery of a deed by the grantor to the grantee, it is impossible to annex a condition to such delivery; and the delivery vests the title in the grantee, although it may be contrary to the intention of the parties.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.