Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

128 Mo. 652

Walser v. Wear

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 21, 1895

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1895-05-21

<p>Appeal from Barton Circuit Court. — Hon. D. P. Stratton, Judge.</p>

Relies on State v. Harris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Appeal dismissed · Decided 1895-05-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 1915

20 state decisions

140189519001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gantt, P. J. —

¶1This is an appeal from the circuit court of Barton county, Missouri. Respondent insists the appeal should be dismissed or the judgment affirmed for failure to comply with rules 11, 12 and 13 of this court, for the reason that appellant has failed to file a proper abstract of the record. The cause is here simply on a certificate of judgment and the order allowing an appeal.

¶2The appellant, at great cost, has filed a printed volume of some six hundred and six pages, but it is not indexed, and can not be sustained as a compliance with rule 14.

¶3This printed volume does not contain the record proper, save an occasional reference thereto in the bill of exceptions. There is no record proper here outside of the certificate of judgment and appeal, and we have repeatedly ruled that the recitals in the bill of exceptions will not supply the record proper. State v. Harris, 121 Mo. 445.

¶4There is no certificate by the clerk to the volume of evidence filed, nor is there any indorsement thereon indicating that it is intended as an abstract of the record and certainly it would be a clear misnomer to so style it.

¶5For failure to comply with rule 13, the appeal is dismissed.

Burgess and Sherwood, JJ., concur.
/128/mo/652 · .json · Public domain