Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 N.C. 600 - State v. Baum.

State v. Baum.’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2016

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

30190119101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in some degree required by the necessity or convenience of the public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “These conditions constitute ample evidence of a navigable stream.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.