Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 N.C. App. 236 - State v. Caporasso

128 N.C. App. 236 - State v. Caporasso’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2011

8 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Henderson v. Brown · Delaware v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hile in-court identifications are generally admitted, they may be excluded if tainted by a prior confrontation in circumstances shown to be unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n in-court identification is considered competent where the identification is independent in origin and based upon the witness' observations at the time and scene of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.