Sciaudone v. Steuk’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield · Hoyt v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance · National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. Maca · Laconia Rod & Gun Club v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · Charest v. Union Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hatever its effects may be in identifying the nature of an insured interest and the extentof coverage, the clause has nothing to do with identifying the insureds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“barred coverage for any liability. The court summarily dismissed the severability clause argument that the policy must be construed as divisible, stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.