State v. Jaroma’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably State v. Diaz (1993), State v. Canelo (1995)
2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spinelli v. United States · Michigan v. Long · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe · State v. Ball · State v. Sands
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““‘necessarily must reflect the contextual, commonsensical, and fact-based nature of any probable cause determination. In addition, another basic principle to which we adhere is the preference which we accord warrants, and the deference which we afford magistrates, especially in close cases.’””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““12) Captain Gobin of the Goffstown Police Department speaks with Captain Brodeur of the Manchester Police Department who advises that a burglary [occurred] at the office of Attorney Tom Wingate on January 28,1984. Reported stolen in this burglary was a Panasonic VCR. A1 Jaroma is suspected in this burglary. 13) On January 8,1984 a burglary was reported to the Manchester Police Department by JW Sowden Associates. Reported stolen in this burglary were the following items. (See Attached List). A1 Jaroma is suspected in this burglary, due to Modus Operandi and types of items stolen. 14) On June 25, 1984 a burglary was reported by Calverts Furniture Store to the Londonderry Police Department. Reported stolen in this burglary were numerous pieces of furniture. (see attached list) A1 Jaroma is suspected in this burglary, due to Modus Operandi and types of items stolen.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jaroma““[t]o obtain a search warrant, the police must show that at the time of the application for the warrant there is a substantial likelihood of finding the items sought; they need not establish with certainty, or even beyond a reasonable doubt, that the search will lead to the desired result.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grimshaw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.