State v. PAUL T.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably State v. JAVIER M. (2001), State v. Vandenberg (2003)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“doctrine when he removed a plastic bag from the defendant's pocket. The court stated: Finally, the State appears to make a sub-argument under Terry and its progeny regarding the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McGill“the consent given to search [was] voluntary and not a product of duress, coercion, or other vitiating factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davis“the fact that Officer Serna merely speculated about what the object in Paul's pocket”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McGill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.