State v. Ortiz-Burciaga’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Rojo · State v. Franklin · State v. Boyer · State v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“causing of a person to engage in sexual intercourse, cunnilingus, fellatio or anal intercourse or the causing of penetration, to any extent and with any object, of the genital or anal openings of another[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Miera“We must reverse any conviction obtained in a proceeding in which the cumulative impact of irregularities is so prejudicial to a defendant that he is deprived of his fundamental right to a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Miera“turn[ ] on the jury's determination of the credibility of the defendant and the young victim”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Miera
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.