State v. Whitley’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Andresen v. Maryland · 24 Md. App. 128 - Andresen v. State · State v. Cordova
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]taleness involves a variety of considerations, including not only time, but also the character of the crime and the extent of prior activity, the consumable or transferable nature of the items to be seized, the information known about the suspect and his or her habits, and the location to be searched.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gonzales“The greater the uncertainty, the more the probable cause equation requires continuing activity because it is the ongoing nature of the reported illegal activity that allows the inference that the activity is continuing and that the evidence will still exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gonzales“`We review the affidavit by giving it a common-sense reading, considering the affidavit as a whole, to determine whether the issuing judge made an . . . independent determination of probable cause,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nyce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.