Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 N.M. 668 - State v. Traeger

State v. Traeger’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Swafford v. State · State v. Parish · State v. Carrasco · State v. Corneau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For you to find the defendant guilty of Aggravated Battery with a Deadly Weapon as charged in Count II, the state must prove to your satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements of the crime: 1. The defendant, Joseph Traeger, hit [the victim] with a baseball bat, an instrument or object which, when used as a weapon, could cause death or very serious injury; 2. The defendant, Joseph Traeger, intended to injure [the victim]; 3. This happened in Sandoval County, New Mexico on or about the 6th day of July, 1997.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We believe ... that by including the term bludgeon in the statutory definition, the Legislature used it in its narrow sense — an instrument made for its intended use as a weapon. A baseball bat, on the other hand, is primarily designed to hit a ball, not to be used as a weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.