State v. Ulibarri’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
54
cited by 54 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 49 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Buzbee v. Donnelly · In re Morgan · State v. Ulibarri · Maldonado v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he grand jury only makes a finding of probable cause. A defendant should not be required to face a trial in the absence of probable cause. But at a trial on the merits, the State has the obligation to prove not just probable cause but guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Like difficulties with the quality or type of evidence relied upon by the grand jury in returning an indictment, any question of probable cause is necessarily obviated by a finding of guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“mandated constitutional and statutory requirements for instructing the grand jury on the essential elements of the offenses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Martinez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.