128 Ohio App. 3d 335 - State v. Kitchen’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thompkins · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Unger · Brown v. Executive 200, Inc. · Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The propriety of imposing punishment for contempt often turns on whether the contempt is direct or indirect, and on whether it is civil or criminal in nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“permits a court to punish a direct contempt summarily, and due process does not require that the contemnor be granted a hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.