Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 Ohio App. 3d 435 - State v. Blair

128 Ohio App. 3d 435 - State v. Blair’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · 60 Ohio St. 2d 34 - State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] defendant's *Page 5 mere affirmative response to the question whether he understands the nature of the charge against him, without more, is insufficient to support the necessary determination that he understands the nature of the charge against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Ohio courts do not require that the trial court inform the accused of the actual elements of the charged offense; a defendant can obtain this information from whatever source, be it from the trial court itself, the prosecutor, or some other source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.