Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 Okla. 1 - Mayhue v. Clapp

Mayhue v. Clapp’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2015

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

801927193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pettis v. Johnston · Morgan v. Karcher · Lookabaugh v. Epperson · Ray v. Harrison · Myers v. Chamness

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ... If the court acquired no jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, judgment cannot be rendered against him. His rights cannot be determined until he is brought into court. It would be absurd to say that a party who has never been subjected to the jurisdiction of the court should be compelled to show a defense before he is entitled to challenge that jurisdiction.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This is a just and a wholesome rule, for under it, an officer, by his return, cannot make that which is false true. Where a judgment, regular upon its face, based upon an officer's return showing personal service, is sought to be vacated and set aside, public policy demands that it should not be overcome, except upon clear and convincing proof that the return is false.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.