State v. Rivers’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish the existence of a [previous] conviction, a certified copy of the judgment and sentence is the best evidence. The State may introduce other comparable evidence only if it shows that the writing is unavailable for some reason other than the serious fault of the proponent. In that case, comparable documents of record or trial transcripts may suffice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mendoza“did not present any statement on oath or otherwise argue that he was not the person named in the judgment and sentence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Priest“[I]llegal or erroneous sentences may be challenged for the first time on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mendoza
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.