Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 P3D 725 - Price v. Eastham

Price v. Eastham’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 43 U.S.C. § 982

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Breck v. Ulmer · Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. · State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Carlson · Andersen v. Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “make specific factual findings regarding ... the original purpose and use of the easement; any changes that have been made in the use of -the casement; and, finally, the reasonableness of that change, taking into account such factors as the speed of the changes in use, damage to the estate, and the reasonable expectations of the servient landowner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) depend on new or controverted facts; (2) are not closely related to appellant's arguments at trial; and (8) could not have been gleaned from the pleadings, unless the new issue raised establishes plain error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “opinion of February 9, 2000, [in which] the superior court note[d] that evidence in the record suggests that the trail was used only occasionally for many years by a small number of people.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.