State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2025
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Braverman v. United States · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny number of acts in the days preceding the climax here could be labeled the substantial step that completed the crime of conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Knight“a sentencing enhancement for a firearm requires a jury finding of a firearm; a deadly weapon finding is not enough.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams“had no purpose or intent outside of accomplishing the robbery”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Francis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.