Bennett v. Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1963
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co. · Tillery v. Fuller · Landry v. McWilliams · Shelly v. Friedrichs · Gayle v. Slicer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Louisiana, That for the purposes of taxation and tax sales it shall be sufficient to assess and describe all property according to such a description as will reasonably identify the property assessed; such as designating the tract or lot by the name by which it is commonly known, or by the number or letter by which it may be usually designated upon the regular assessment rolls, or upon an official or private plan or sketch or by giving the boundaries or the name of the owners upon each side, or by the dimensions or description or name given in the act translating the ownership thereof, or by such other further description as may furnish the means of reasonable identification. “Section 2. Be if further enacted &c, That for the purposes of taxation and tax sales it shall be sufficient to assess and advertise all property in the name of the person or persons whether dead or alive, who at the time the assessment was made, appeared to be the owners thereof upon the books of the conveyance office, in the parish of Orleans, or of the Recorder’s offices in the other parishes of the State; but ail property may be assessed in the name of the real owner, and if held in trust, in the name of the fiduciary, as such. “Section 3. Be it further enacted &c, That no assessment or tax sale shall be set aside or annulled for any error in description or measurement of the property assessed, in the name of the owner, provided the pr”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Van Norden v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.