128 So. 3d 1034 - Ledet v. Campo’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 755 So. 2d 226 - Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. Sunbeam Corp. · 634 So. 2d 1180 - Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd. · Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. · 870 So. 2d 1002 - Jones v. Estate of Santiago · 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the movant will not bear the burden of proof at trial on the matter that is before the court on the motion for sum mary judgment, the movant’s burden on the motion does not require him to negate all essential elements of the adverse party’s claim, action, or defense, but rather to point out to the court that there is an absence of factual support for one or more elements essential to the adverse party’s claim, action, or defense. Thereafter, if the adverse party fails to produce factual support sufficient to establish that he will be able to satisfy his evidentiary burden of proof at trial, there is no genuine issue of material fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.