128 So. 3d 111 - Holley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 878 So. 2d 1236 - Baker v. State · State v. Spencer · 358 So. 2d 183 - Hines v. State · 29 So. 3d 959 - Ferrell v. State · Logan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n affidavit upon which a permanent revocation of probation is to be based must allege the basic facts concerning the alleged violation, such as its nature, time, and place of occurrence. However, an allegation concerning the commission of a crime need not be set forth with the specificity required in criminal indictments and informations. The primary goal is notice composing with minimal due process rights. If a probationer needs additional information in order to properly prepare a defense to the charges, the various methods of discovery under our rules are available to [the probationer].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.