Candler v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 639 So. 2d 224 - Orgeron on Behalf of Orgeron v. McDonald · 761 So. 2d 507 - Timmons v. Silman · T.S. v. Rapides Parish School Board · 734 So. 2d 1253 - Alford v. STATE FARM AUTO. INS. CO. · Kinard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[WJhether the employee’s tortious conduct was so closely connected in time, place and causation to his employment, duties as to be regarded a risk of harm fairly attributable to the employer’s business, as compared to conduct motivated by purely personal considerations entirely extraneous to the employer’s interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hopper v. Austin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.