Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 So. 3d 627 - Johnson v. Johnson

128 So. 3d 627 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. · Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. · Clement v. Frey · 773 So. 2d 670 - Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Additionally, our jurisprudence has established that truck drivers, as specially trained operators of vehicles, are subject to a higher standard when assessing their degree of responsibility in an accident. They are 'superior actor[s] in the eyes of the law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.