Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 Tex. 81 - Harris v. Leslie

Harris v. Leslie’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 1990 · most notably International-Great Northern R. v. Acker (1939), Amarillo Oil Co. v. Energy-Agri Products, Inc. (1990)

32 state decisions

1501936194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The case before the Court of Civil Appeals out of which the question arose is Harris v. Thornton's Department Store, 94 S.W.2d 849 . The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals freely admits the conflict of decisions on the question, but follows the opinion of this court in Gulf, C. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley, 113 Tex. 472 , 260 S.W. 561 , 32 A.L.R. 1183 . This court, as recently stated in Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Gallagher, [ 127 Tex. 553 :], 94 S.W.2d 410 , will not require the certification of a question which it has already decided, unless the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals on that question is contrary to the Supreme Court's decision thereon. The decision of the Court of Civil Appeals being in harmony with the decision of this court in the Conley Case, supra, the motion for leave to file will be denied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.