Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 U.S. 132 - Chappell v. Bradshaw

Chappell v. Bradshaw’s Empirical Analysis

128 U.S. 132 · 1888

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2014 · most notably Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co. (1918), Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co. (1924)

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

20018881890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spies v. Illinois · The Anarchists' Case Spies · Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) “ Where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty, or statute of, or authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity; ” (2) “ Where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of their validity ; ” (3) “ Or where any title, right, privilege or immunity is claimed under the Constitution, or any treaty or statute of, or commission held or authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege or immunity specially set up and claimed by either party under such Constitution, statute, commission or authority.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.