128 Wash. 2d 300 - Reese v. Stroh’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably State v. Thomas (2004), Berger v. Sonneland (2001)
64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Frye v. United States · 125 Wash. 2d 24 - State v. Russell · McFarland v. Leyh · 120 Wash. 2d 879 - State v. Cauthron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing. If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he general rule in Washington is that expert medical testimony on the issue of proximate cause is required in medical malpractice cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berger v. Sonneland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.