Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 WASH2D 388 - State v. Rose

State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
7
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2013

24 state decisions

170199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Payton v. New York · Texas v. Brown · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The fact that a flashlight is used does not transform an observation which would fall within the open view doctrine during daylight into an impermissible search simply because darkness falls. One who leaves contraband in plain sight, visible through an unobstructed window to anyone standing on the front porch of his residence, does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the visible area.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “when a law enforcement officer is able to detect something by utilization of one or more of his senses while lawfully present at the vantage point where those senses are used, that detection does not constitute a `search'[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[i]t is clear that police with legitimate business may enter areas of the curtilage which are impliedly open, such as access routes to the house.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.